08 Feb This will in reality not be a problem with which framework; Sir John de Keith d
Re: ? Comyn wife regarding Malise
Concerning the Comyn daughter who was simply spouse off Malise out of Strathearn, I got theorized inside 2005 you to she was indeed Margaret, recognized as spouse out-of Sir John de- Keith (find content off article below) who was simply 2ndly e are provided for the reason that article: this new wife Emma I suggest is actually of some other family relations, and never mother of your own next Earl Malise.
Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan_ , claims partly, ‘Malise, Earl off Strathearn, got a partner Emma, into the 1261-1267, whose surname is unknown ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. off Docs., we. 2383, vilken europeisk nationalitet Г¤r bГ¤st att gifta sig 2451]. sometime before 1270, so that his widow (Margaret) would-have-been “available” sometime just after Emma.
This is naturally a speculation; it will have the advantageous asset of working with a well-known dating anywhere between Muriel Keith and you can Reginald ce Cheyne. Any further relevant paperwork do of course getting anticipate.
The newest account when you look at the Scots Peerage about the family of Keith says from Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) he was thought to enjoys partnered Comyn, earl of Buchan . So it personality, of your own not sure (“considered had been”) assortment, can now be fixed in line with the pursuing the dispensation, old on Fondi into 14 The month of january 1378/9::
‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Towards the bishop off Moray. Professors so you’re able to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, from the impediment so you can relationship as a result of the 3rd and you will 4th degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘
Muriel Keith, the long term next partner away from Robert Stewart, very first Duke from Albany (d. 1420), are developed in order to wed Reginald ce Cheyne, young buck regarding Sir Reginald le Cheyne from the his partner (since their own very first partner), Helen away from Strathearn. If you find yourself you’ll find renowned gaps in the origins out of Muriel Keith, she and you can Reginald ce Cheyne do display a descent regarding Comyns. But not, that is also distant to require a dispensation if Muriel was good-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1233), which will function as case in the event the is why child.
dos. Reginald ce Cheyne is a-grandson from Marjory Comyn, child away from Alexander Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan (d. 1290), young man regarding William Comyn in the above list. Their own young man are Malise, Earl off Strathearn regarding 1312 in order to his death when you look at the 1328 , and you will parent out-of Reginald.
california. 1270), try same as Marjory Comyn, and you can hitched 2ndly in order to Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn (d. 1312). This would indicate the brand new parentage a€?considered has actually been’ regarding Margaret, wife from Sir John de Keith, try away from you to definitely generation: she’d n’t have already been the latest d Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan, but instead off their son Alexander. There isn’t any evidence you to definitely Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn had been married far prior to 1275: as Lindsay typed,
There’s you to definitely discernable foundation on which the connection anywhere between Reginald ce Cheyne and Muriel Keith will have existed: when the Margaret Comyn, partner of Sir John de Keith (d
‘ The spouse in the earl, on the 1275, are titled Marjory, once we understand the attesting condition out of Zero. curriculum vitae., and is stated by Wyntoun, Guide VIII. guy. vi., getting come the following sis off John Comyn, Earl off Buchan, just who discussed with respect to Earl Malise the wedding settlement above stated [dated at London, April 26, 1293 to possess their daughter Matilda and Robert de- Tony, son off Ralph].’
Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy E out of Buchan I __________________I________________ We III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als I Age regarding Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We I I I We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Elizabeth out of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony We ______I_______________________ I I We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- Elizabeth from Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 I le Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David I V I We de Graham Sir William de- I We__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ I I We III We I We We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke off Albany)
No Comments